Search Results for "trade discount"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "trade discount"

44 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Lottery Ticket Commission TDS Case — Difference Between Face Value and Sale Price Not 'Commission' Under Section 194G of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that trade discount given to agents/dealers for encouraging sale of lottery tickets does not amount to commission requiring tax deduction at source, and thus no liability under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) arises.

9 Apr 2026

The case involves a tax dispute between the Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore (petitioner) and M/s Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd (respondent/assess...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Section 7 Petition in Insolvency Case Due to Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets and Emails. Repeated acknowledgment of debt by Corporate Debtor in balance sheets and emails extends limitation period under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, saving the petition from being time-barred.

3 Jul 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Akzo Nobel India Ltd. (Financial Creditor) against Stan Cars Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section 61 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit by National Textile Corporation Against Debtor for Unpaid Goods of Nationalised Mill. Contractual Interest Rate of 21% Reduced to 6% as Penal, Suit Held Within Limitation Under Article 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.

10 Aug 2005

The plaintiff, National Textile Corporation Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.3,18,876/- with interest at 21% per annum from the defendant, M/s S....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

7 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Bank Guarantees in Tender Dispute. Earnest Money Deposit Forfeited as Bidder's Unilateral Discount Offer After Bid Opening Violated Tender Terms.

23 Dec 2010

The petitioner, Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in coal trading, along with its shareholder, filed a writ petition under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Holds That High Court Erred in Dismissing Suit on Grounds Not Raised in Pleadings and Without Considering Documentary Evidence. The Court restored the decree for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 with interest at 15% per annum from the date of suit till payment.

16 Dec 2021

The appellant, M/s Star Paper Mills Limited, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 against the respondents, M/s Beharilal Madanlal Jaipuria Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)