Search Results for "television advertisement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "television advertisement"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Dabur in Disparagement and Trademark Infringement Suit Over Amla Hair Oil Advertisements. The court held that the defendant's television commercial disparaged the plaintiff's 'Nihar' amla hair oil by falsely implying inferiority, violating principles of comparative advertising under trademark law.

4 Dec 2019

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a manufacturer of household brands including 'Nihar' amla hair oil, filed a commercial IP suit alleging that the defend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Municipal Notices Requiring Permission and Fees for Displaying Illuminated Signboards and ATM Boards. Display of illuminated signboards and ATM boards constitutes 'advertisement' under Section 328-A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and is subject to regulation by the municipal corporation.

22 Mar 2016

The petitioners, ICICI Bank Limited and another, challenged notices and an order dated 24 October 2007 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Municipal Notices Requiring Permission and Fees for Displaying Illuminated Signboards, ATMs, and Extension Counters. Display of illuminated signboards and ATM boards constitutes 'advertisement' under Section 328-A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and is subject to regulation by the municipal corporation.

22 Mar 2016

The petitioners, ICICI Bank Limited and another, filed a writ petition challenging notices issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in Legal Metrology Case — Use of 'Angula' in Advertisement Not a Violation of Section 11(1)(c) of Legal Metrology Act, 2009. The expression 'angula' in a chocolate advertisement was held to be a descriptive term for a small measurement, not a unit of length under the Act.

16 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Cadbury India Ltd., a manufacturer of chocolates, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

22 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Advertisement Expenses Not Subject to Disallowance. Assessee's expenditure on promoting foreign channels held to be for its own business benefit, not requiring compensation from foreign principals.

13 Oct 2014

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29th July 2011, which confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Maharashtra Stamp Act Amendment on Advertisements. Petition Seeks Declaration that Imposition of Stamp Duty on Mass Media Advertising Contracts is Unconstitutional and Void.

27 Oct 2016

The Advertising Agencies Association of India and several other entities representing advertising, newspaper publishing, and broadcasting sectors file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by USV Pvt Ltd in Disparagement Cases, Upholds Injunction Against Comparative Advertising. The court held that disparaging a rival's product by implying it contains harmful ingredients without scientific basis constitutes unfair trade practice under Section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

13 Jul 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by USV Private Limited (USVPL) against a common order dated 16th June 2022 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction Application in 'AirTel' Trademark Dispute Between Telecom and Liquor Companies. Plaintiffs Allege Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Against Defendants Using Identical Mark on Alcoholic Beverages.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiffs, a leading telecommunications company providing mobile services under the brand 'AirTel', filed a suit against the defendants, a liquor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against CCI's Investigation Order in Competition Act Case. Broadcasters Challenge Order Under Section 26(1) Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Application of Mind.

16 Oct 2019

Star India Private Limited and Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 July 2018 passed by the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)