High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in Legal Metrology Case — Use of 'Angula' in Advertisement Not a Violation of Section 11(1)(c) of Legal Metrology Act, 2009. The expression 'angula' in a chocolate advertisement was held to be a descriptive term for a small measurement, not a unit of length under the Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 186
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Cadbury India Ltd., a manufacturer of chocolates, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 13.08.2012 passed by the Controller of Legal Metrology (Respondent No.1) and the proceedings initiated by a notice dated 15.12.2011 issued by the Inspector of Legal Metrology (Respondent No.2). The notice alleged that the petitioner had violated Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 by using the word 'angula' (meaning 'inch') in a Kannada version of a television advertisement for its '5 star' chocolate. The advertisement depicted a person asking a tailor to shorten his father's pants by one 'angula'. The respondents contended that 'angula' is a non-metric unit of length and its use in an advertisement contravened the Act. The petitioner argued that the word was used colloquially and descriptively, not as a unit of measurement in trade or commerce. The court examined the notice and the relevant provisions. It observed that the word 'angula' was used in a humorous context to indicate a small measurement, not as a precise unit of length. The court held that the use of the word did not fall within the prohibition of Section 11(1)(c) as it was not used in the context of trade, commerce, or advertisement of a product's measurement. The court quashed the notice and the impugned order, ruling that the proceedings were an abuse of process. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Legal Metrology - Prohibition of Non-Metric Units - Section 11(1)(c) Legal Metrology Act, 2009 - Interpretation - The court considered whether the use of the word 'angula' (meaning 'inch') in a chocolate advertisement violated Section 11(1)(c) which prohibits the use of non-metric units in any advertisement. The court held that the word 'angula' was used descriptively to indicate a small measurement, not as a unit of length in trade or commerce. The notice was quashed as the expression was not used in the context of trade or commerce but as a colloquial term in a humorous advertisement. (Paras 2-6)

B) Legal Metrology - Show Cause Notice - Quashing - Section 11 r/w 29 Legal Metrology Act, 2009 - The court quashed the show cause notice issued by the Legal Metrology Inspector alleging violation of Section 11(1)(c) for using 'angula' in a Kannada advertisement. The court reasoned that the word was not used as a unit of measurement but as a descriptive term, and the notice was an abuse of process. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the use of the word 'angula' in a television advertisement for chocolates constitutes a violation of Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, which prohibits the use of non-metric units of measurement in trade, commerce, or advertisement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 13.08.2012 passed by Respondent No.1 and the notice dated 15.12.2011 issued by Respondent No.2 are quashed. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Section 11(1)(c) of Legal Metrology Act
  • 2009
  • Use of non-metric units in advertisements
  • De minimis non curat lex
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (01) 8

Writ Petition No.39175/2012 (GM-RES)

2013-01-16

Dilip B. Bhosale

Sri.M.Dhyan Chinnappa for Crest Law Partners (for petitioner), Sri.M.Keshava Reddy, AGA (for respondents)

Cadbury India Ltd.

Controller of Legal Metrology, Department of Legal Metrology, Bangalore & The Inspector, Department of Legal Metrology, Shimoga Sub-Division

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a show cause notice and order under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the order dated 13.08.2012 passed by Respondent No.1 and all proceedings in relation to the notice dated 15.12.2011.

Filing Reason

The petitioner challenged the notice alleging violation of Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 for using the word 'angula' in a chocolate advertisement.

Issues

Whether the use of the word 'angula' in a television advertisement constitutes a violation of Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the word 'angula' was used descriptively and colloquially, not as a unit of measurement in trade or commerce. The respondents contended that 'angula' is a non-metric unit of length and its use in an advertisement violates Section 11(1)(c) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The use of the word 'angula' in a chocolate advertisement was not in the context of trade, commerce, or as a unit of measurement, but as a descriptive term for a small measurement. Therefore, it does not violate Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, which prohibits the use of non-metric units in advertisements only when used as units of measurement in trade or commerce.

Judgment Excerpts

The expression 'angula' means, 'an inch', and that being a non metric system of length, they allegedly violated the provisions contained in Section 11(1)(c) of the Act. In my opinion, the word 'angula' is used in the advertisement only to indicate a small measurement and not as a unit of length. The notice/letter dated 15.12.2011 issued by respondent No.2 and the order dated 13.08.2012 passed by respondent No.1 are quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner received a notice dated 15.12.2011 from Respondent No.2 alleging violation of Section 11(1)(c) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. The petitioner challenged the notice and the subsequent order dated 13.08.2012 passed by Respondent No.1 by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition was heard and disposed of on 16.01.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Legal Metrology Act, 2009: 11, 11(1)(c), 13, 14, 29, 50
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by High Court in SFIO Case Involving Massive Corporate Fraud. Twin Conditions Under Section 212(6)(ii) of Companies Act, 2013 Must Be Satisfied Before Granting Bail for Offences Under Section 447.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Detention Order for Violation of Interim Injunction in Partition Suit — Willful Disobedience of Court Order Attracts Civil Prison Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.