Search Results for "suo motu reference"

706 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 706 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Initiates Suo-Motu Writ Petition Challenging Appointments of Personal Assistants to Judges. Selection Process Through Circular Dated 07.06.2023 Found to Contravene Rule 14A of Madras High Court Service Rules, 2015, and Article 14 Due to Arbitrary Relaxations and Irregularities.

Background: The High Court of Madras, through a Division Bench, initiated a suo-motu writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, tak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enquiry Order Under Section 83 of MCS Act — No Pre-Decided Views Found in Registrar's Order. Appointment of Authorised Officer for Enquiry into Society's Affairs Upheld as Registrar Acted on Prima Facie Material Without Prejudging Issues.

The Petitioner, Raghuleela Megamall Kandivali (West), a cooperative society formed by occupiers of units in a mall, challenged an order dated 9 March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Convicts Contemnors for Scandalous Allegations Against Judges in Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings. The Court upheld its inherent power under Article 129 to punish for contempt, rejecting procedural objections under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Vijay Kurle, Rashid Khan Pathan, and Nilesh Ojha for sending letters contai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...