Search Results for "suo moto revision"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Entries Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Rights Restored as Ex-Parte Cancellation Without Notice Held Illegal Under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, 227 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Thakkar Yogeshbhai Amritlal, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging multi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Land Ceiling Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Revision Application under Section 89A of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 held time-barred and without proper notice.

The petitioner, M/S Anchor Daewoo Industries Ltd, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Land Allotment Dispute: Challenging Cancellation Orders Examining the Legal Validity and Timeliness of Cancellation Proceedings under UPZALR Act

Appeal against a judgment dated 19.01.2010 by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which upheld the cancellation of a patta (land allotment) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act for Delay Beyond Limitation Period. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 15 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Shaikh Ahmed, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Reopening Enquiry. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961 Cannot Be Initiated After 17 Years from Original Order.

The petitioner, Ashok Rangrao Deshmukh, a resident of Parbhani, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdin...