Search Results for "statutory deposit"

3248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking Mandatory Deposit of VRS Benefits by Workmen Under MRTU & PULP Act. No Condition Precedent for Deposit Exists Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act for Challenging Voluntary Retirement Scheme.

The petitioner, Saint Gobain Sekurit India Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the maintainability of complaints filed by respondent workmen un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI's Moratorium and Liquidation of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. — Petitioners' Deposits Not Covered by Deposit Insurance as Bank Was Under Moratorium Prior to Insurance Scheme Introduction.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by depositors of the CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd., which was placed under moratorium by the Res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MPID Act Deposit Dispute — High Court Erred in Treating Investment as Loan Transaction. The court held that amounts advanced with promise of interest constitute 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of MPID Act, and failure to repay amounts to 'fraudulent default' under Section 3.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellants' Criminal Revision Application under the MPID Act. The ap...