Search Results for "stamp duty refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "stamp duty refund"

211 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Stamp Duty Assessment on NCLT Order Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 -- Petitioner Challenges Rs. 50,00,000 Duty on Amalgamation Scheme Instrument

18 Feb 2026

The High Court heard a writ petition by Petitioner. challenging stamp duty assessment of Rs. 50,00,000 on an NCLT Mumbai order sanctioning a composite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Adjudication on Conveyance Deed — No Refund of Additional Stamp Duty Paid After Registration. Petitioners Not Aggrieved Party as They Accepted Assessment and Got Document Registered; No Error in Considering Market Value as Per Ready Reckoner for Non-Agricultural Land.

2 May 2024

The petitioners, purchasers of agricultural land, executed an agreement for sale on 9 November 2006, which was not registered. The document was impoun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Part Regarding Stamp Duty on Arbitral Award in Execution Proceedings — Directs Payment of Proper Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The court held that stamp duty on an arbitral award is payable at the rate applicable on the date of the award, not the date of execution petition, and the decree-holder is liable to pay the same.

28 Jul 2023

The case involves two writ petitions arising from execution proceedings in Com.Ex.Pet.No.224/2021 before the LXXXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Jud...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Stamp Duty Valuation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Agreement to Sell Prior to Freehold Conversion. The Court held that the market value of property for stamp duty purposes must be determined as on the date of the agreement to sell, not the sale deed, where the agreement was prior to conversion from leasehold to freehold.

25 Apr 2023

The dispute in this appeal involved the determination of the market value of a property at Allahabad purchased by the appellants under a registered sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

23 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Consumer Dispute, Overturns High Court's Limitation Bar. Stamp Duty Refund Application Not Barred by Six-Month Limitation Under Section 48(3) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Stamp Paper Purchased Bona Fide and Transaction Failed Due to Judicial Order from National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

24 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from the appellant's booking of a residential apartment in Pune in 2014, where he paid stamp duty for an agreement to sell. A d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Benefit of Government Order Dated 29th August, 2020 for Stamp Duty Concession in Addition to ITP Regulation Concession. The Court held that the Government Order dated 29th August, 2020 is a separate and independent concession and the Petitioners are entitled to avail both concessions under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

22 Feb 2021

The Petitioners, Macrotech Developers Ltd. and Palava Dwellers Private Ltd., are companies engaged in real estate development. They filed a Writ Petit...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)