Search Results for "sports law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "sports law"

450 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of S. Nithya Judgments to Cricket Associations in Membership and Election Dispute. Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association Appeals Against Madras High Court's Application of Athletics Governance Reforms to Cricket Association

13 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court heard appeals from the Appellant against the Madras High Court's judgment that applied directions from S. Nithya cases to the cricke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Madras High Court Directions in Formula 4 Racing PIL - Contractual Obligations Under MoU Cannot Be Unilaterally Altered by Court. The Court held that the High Court erred in directing the appellant to reimburse the State's expenditure and deposit future costs, as such directions contradicted the express terms of the MoU between the parties.

1 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered appeals against an order of the Madras High Court dated 19.02.2024, which disposed of several public interest litigations...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sports Coach Advertisement Eligibility Criteria. Court holds that inclusion of degree holders and State-level sportspersons is not arbitrary under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

5 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Dadaso Balaso Awad and Yogesh Prakash More, are Diploma holders in Sports Coaching from Netaji Subhash National Institute of Sports (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Water Sports Activities Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 — Levy Not Ultra Vires Constitution. Court holds that water sports activities constitute 'entertainment' under Section 2(3) of the Act and that the proviso to Section 3(1) and Section 3(5A) are valid, but remits matter for determination of actual duty liability.

4 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Drishti Adventures Sports Private Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Mandamus on Reservation Quotas in Medical Admissions, Upholding State Discretion Under Article 15(5). The Court Held That Reservation Policies Are Enabling and Cannot Be Compelled by Writ of Mandamus, Setting Aside Directions for Specific Quotas in Private and Government Institutions.

25 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the State of Punjab against a common judgment and order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The dispute arose f...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction of Sports Club Complex and Shops — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Illegality or Violation of Statutory Provisions. The court upheld the validity of the construction as it was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department under the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

30 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Aires D'Costa, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of the Varca Sports Club Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee's Order Invalidating Caste Claim. Court upholds that the Scrutiny Committee's finding of invalidity of caste claim based on documentary evidence and vigilance report is final and binding unless perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sandeep Sambhaji Yadav, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, which invalidated his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee's Order Invalidating Caste Claim. Court upholds that the Scrutiny Committee's finding of invalid caste claim based on lack of historical evidence and affinity is final and binding, and the petitioner cannot rely on subsequent acquisition of caste certificate from another state.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sandeep Sambhaji Yadav, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Scrutiny Committee that invalidated his caste claim as belo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)