Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction of Sports Club Complex and Shops — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Illegality or Violation of Statutory Provisions. The court upheld the validity of the construction as it was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department under the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Aires D'Costa, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of the Varca Sports Club Complex and the shops therein. The petitioner alleged that the construction was illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The respondents, including the Chief Secretary of Goa, the Assistant Engineer of PWD, the Chief Engineer of PWD, the Senior Town Planner, the Village Panchayat of Varca, the Varca Sports Club, and various shop owners, opposed the petition. The court examined the records and found that the construction was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or violation of statutory provisions. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. The court did not find any merit in the petitioner's contentions and upheld the validity of the construction.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Construction of Sports Club Complex - Alleged Violation of Planning Laws - Petitioner challenged construction of Varca Sports Club Complex and shops alleging violation of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Court examined the records and found that the construction was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department - Held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or violation of statutory provisions (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the construction of the Varca Sports Club Complex and the shops therein was illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The court found no illegality or violation of statutory provisions in the construction of the Varca Sports Club Complex and the shops.

Law Points

  • No illegality in construction
  • No violation of statutory provisions
  • Petitioner failed to establish any right
  • Writ petition dismissed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016:BHC-GOA:1075

WRIT PETITION NO.121 of 2016

2020-12-30

2016:BHC-GOA:1075

Mr. Aires D'Costa alias Ayres Genesio Jose Estevan Da Costa

The Chief Secretary, Govt of Goa; The Assistant Engineer, PWD; The Chief Engineer, PWD; The Senior Town Planner; The Village Panchayat of Varca; Mr. Joaquim Alemao; M/s Varca Sports Club; Mr. Joaquim Alemao; M/s HDFC Bank Ltd.; Mrs. Martus Dais; Mrs. Felicidade M. Dias; Mr. Protus Dias; Mrs. Lourdina Dias; Mrs. Eremita Fernandes; Mr. Jose Agnelo Fernandes; Mr. Jose A.N.A.D'Souza; Mrs. Effy De Souza; St. Anthony Medicentre Chemist & Druggist; Mr. Pedro Fernandes; Mrs. Piedade Fernandes

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the construction of a sports club complex and shops.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to declare the construction illegal and to direct demolition.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the construction was in violation of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Issues

Whether the construction of the Varca Sports Club Complex and the shops therein was illegal and in violation of statutory provisions?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the construction was illegal and violated the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Respondents argued that the construction was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner failed to establish any illegality or violation of statutory provisions. The construction was duly approved by the competent authorities.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner failed to establish any illegality or violation of statutory provisions. Construction was duly approved by the Village Panchayat and the Town and Country Planning Department.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974:
  • Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Construction of Sports Club Complex and Shops — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Illegality or Violation of Statutory Provisions. The court upheld the validity of the construction as it...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expuls...