WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020
18 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...
Search Results for "special purpose vehicle"
1311 result(s) found
Found 1311 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Release of Vehicle Seized in NDPS Case to Owner on Supurdnama — Vehicle Not Liable to Confiscation Without Conviction. The Court held that the NDPS Act does not bar release of a vehicle pending trial, and the Sessions Court erred in rejecting the application for interim custody.
27 Jul 2010The petitioner, Anil Navnath Marathe, was the owner of a Mahindra Max Jeep bearing registration No. MH-12-EF-5860. He was also accused no. 2 in NDPS (...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Accused, No Confiscation Proceedings Initiated. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Interim Custody Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. Pending Trial, Subject to Conditions Including Bank Guarantee of Rs. 1,00,000.
5 Aug 2024The petitioner, Kawal Jeet Kaur, is the registered owner of a vehicle (a truck) that was seized by the Excise Range Office, Indi, in Crime No. 105/202...
- 230
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Interim Custody of Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Implicated, Vehicle Not Used for Conveyance of Contraband. Lorry owner's application for interim custody allowed as vehicle was hired for lawful transport and owner was not an accused, with no evidence of owner's complicity.
1 Jan 2025The appellant, Denash, is the owner of a lorry bearing registration number TN 52 Q 0315 (Ashok Leyland, 14 wheeler). The vehicle was lawfully hired fo...
- 142
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958
8 Jan 2026The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...
- 893
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Financier's Appeal in U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Case, Upholding Tax Liability for Financier-in-Possession. Financier Qualifies as 'Owner' Under Section 2(h) and Must Pay Tax in Advance Under Section 4, with Refund Available Under Section 12 for Non-Use, Irrespective of Actual Use or Registration Status.
22 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the Full Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Bench Lucknow, which dismissed a writ petition filed ...
- 341
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tax Demand for Non-Use of Stage Carriage — Petitioner Entitled to Exemption Under Section 16 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Intimation of Non-Use Given and Received; Department Failed to Prove Vehicle Was Used During Period.
6 Feb 2014The petitioner, Mr. S. Naseer Pasha, is the owner of a stage carriage bearing registration No. KA-07/5233. He filed a writ petition under Articles 226...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in NDPS Case: Recovery from Vehicle Search Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance of Section 50 for Personal Search. The Court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, and recovery of contraband from a vehicle can independently sustain a conviction under Section 15.
15 Oct 2019The State of Punjab appealed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana which had set aside the conviction and sentence of Baljinder...
- 435
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Petition for Interim Custody of Seized Tractor Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. — Rejection by Lower Courts Set Aside. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Release Pending Investigation Subject to Conditions to Prevent Deterioration.
6 Jun 2017The petitioner, Vithoba S/o Shantappa Prachandi, is the owner of a tractor bearing registration No.KA-28-NT-019388/2016-17, which was seized by the In...
- 65
High Court
High Court Quashes FIR and Orders Release of Seized Vehicle in Fraud Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Court Held That Seizure by Senior Motor Vehicle Inspector Was Illegal Due to Lack of Authority Under Sections 318(4) and 336(3) Read with 3(5) of BNS, and Directed Return of Lamborghini Car to Owner.
25 Mar 2026The dispute involved a criminal petition filed by the petitioner, represented by its proprietor, challenging an FIR registered against it for offences...
- 431
