Search Results for "siphoning of funds"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Former Director in Fraudulent Trading Case Under Section 66 IBC. The Tribunal upheld the finding that the appellant siphoned funds and engaged in wrongful trading during liquidation of Easytech Global Private Limited.

The present appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was filed by Mr. Gopal Kalra, the erstwhile director of M/s Easy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Garnishee Order Against Respondent in Execution of Decree — Debt Acknowledged in Balance Sheets Constitutes Admission of Liability. The Court directed attachment and deposit of Rs. 17,40,82,984/- under Order XXI Rules 46 and 46A CPC, finding no real dispute under Rule 46-C.

The Applicant, Drive India Enterprises Solutions Ltd., is the Judgment Creditor in a decree dated 10th September 2018 against the Judgment Debtor, Hai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Chartered Accountant in Financial Fraud Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Professional Advice Without Specific Role in Siphoning Funds Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under RBI Act and SEBI Act.

The applicant, Parag Raman Hangekar, a chartered accountant, filed a criminal revision application against the order of the Special Judge (Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Incentive Scheme for FCI Loaders but Directs Strict Monitoring to Prevent Abuse of Government Funds. Court finds that while the incentive scheme is legal, its implementation has led to exorbitant earnings and siphoning of funds through collusion with officials.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, took suo motu cognizance of a newspaper report in The Times of India alleging that departmental loaders in Food C...