Search Results for "securitization trust"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "securitization trust"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Bank to Refer MSME Loan Account for Restructuring Under RBI Framework - Petitioner's MSME Status Entitles It to Benefit of Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation. The court held that the bank was obligated to refer the stressed MSME account to the Committee for restructuring as per the Government Notification dated 29.05.2015 and RBI Master Direction dated 21.07.2016, following the Supreme Court's decision in Pro Knits.

29 Jan 2026

The petitioners, Vardhan Agro Processing Limited (petitioner No.1, an MSME) and its chairman and shareholder (petitioner No.2), filed a writ petition ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reiterates: Statutory Remedies Must Be Exhausted in SARFAESI Disputes. When alternative statutory remedies exist, courts should not entertain writ petitions under Article 226.

10 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court dealt with the legality of a High Court's interference in an auction sale under the SARFAESI Act, despite the availability of an alt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Trial Court's Jurisdiction Ruling in SARFAESI Act Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Permanent Injunction Against Re-auction of Mortgaged Property Despite SARFAESI Act Provisions.

16 Apr 2015

The respondent, original plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1756 of 2014 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the applicant bank from re-auc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

28 Mar 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Hospital and Proprietor Against ARCIL in SARFAESI Act Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Dismissing Writ Petitions as Not Maintainable. The Court held that the remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act is an efficacious alternative remedy and the writ petition was not maintainable.

18 Dec 2025

The appellants, M/S Sridevi Hospital and its proprietor Dr. K. Senthilnathan, filed a writ appeal against a common order dated 20.12.2024 passed by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Revision Under Section 154 of MCS Act Allowed Without Proper Hearing. Minister's order set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consider relevant material.

9 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Thakre, claiming to be a member of respondent no. 4 cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment on Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debt. Attachment order set aside as property was sold by secured creditor under SARFAESI Act before attachment, and sales tax dues do not have priority over secured creditor's rights under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act.

16 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Sherwood Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged an attachment order dated 29th April 2013 passed by the Sales Tax Officer ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)