Search Results for "sections 153A and 295A IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "sections 153A and 295A IPC"

13 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Alleged Offences Under Sections 295, 295A, 298 IPC — Statements on Idols Not Constituting Deliberate Malicious Intent to Outrage Religious Feelings. The court held that the petitioner's speech quoting an experiment did not show deliberate and malicious intention required under Section 295A IPC, and the complaint lacked essential ingredients to proceed.

27 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Malleshappa, a former Vice Chancellor of Hampi Kannada University, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Alleged Offences Under Sections 295, 295A, 298 IPC — Statements on Idols Not Constituting Hate Speech or Blasphemy. The court held that the petitioner's philosophical statement about idols lacking power did not amount to deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings, and thus no prima facie case was made out.

27 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Malleshappa, a former Vice Chancellor of Hampi Kannada University, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against TV Show Participants in Religious Sentiment Case. Alleged Offence Under Section 295-A IPC Not Made Out as Acts Did Not Deliberately and Maliciously Intend to Outrage Religious Feelings.

29 Apr 2026

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging the registration of FIR No. 265 of 2010 under Section 295-A read with Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet for Lack of Sanction Under Section 196 CrPC in Religious Outrage Case — WhatsApp Chats Not Deliberate or Malicious Under Section 295A IPC. The court held that prior sanction is mandatory for prosecution under Section 295A IPC and the alleged chats did not constitute deliberate and malicious intent to outrage religious feelings.

24 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) heard two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed by Dr. Subhash and ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Other Anti-Terror Laws. The Appeals Arise from the Judgment and Order of the Trial Court Convicting the Appellants for Terrorist Activities including Bomb Manufacturing and Conspiracy to Wage War Against India.

14 Nov 2022

The case arises from Criminal Appeal Nos. 1206/2017 and 820/2017 filed by accused No. 1 (Sayyed Mohammed Naushad), accused No. 2 (Ahamad Bava Aboobakk...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in WhatsApp Post Case Due to Lack of Intent and Poor Investigation. Forwarding an objectionable post without deliberate and malicious intention does not attract Sections 295-A, 153-A IPC and Section 3(v) of SC/ST Act.

19 Sep 2024

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Rohidas Wakale, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of crimina...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Section 41-A Notice Issued in Uttar Pradesh Fake News FIR; Twitter India Employee Contends No Control Over Platform and No Cause of Action in Karnataka.

23 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Limited (TCIPL), holding the designation of Managing Director b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Multiple FIRs Under UP Conversion Act and IPC for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Procedural Non-Compliance. FIRs Filed by Third Party Not Authorized Under Unamended Section 4 of the Act and Vague Allegations of Fraud and Conversion Do Not Constitute Offences; Court Emphasizes Misuse of Criminal Machinery and Importance of Protecting Religious Freedom.

1 Jan 1970

The present batch of matters comprised three writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution and nine appeals by special leave against orders of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Journalist in Multiple FIR Case Based on News Broadcasts. Court Transfers One FIR for Investigation, Stays Other Proceedings, and Emphasizes Balance Between Freedom of Speech and Criminal Process Under Article 19(1)(a) and Article 32 of the Constitution.

19 May 2020

The dispute arose from two news broadcasts by the petitioner, a journalist and editor-in-chief of Republic TV and R Bharat, on 16 April 2020 and 21 Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalists in Sedition Case for Reporting on Alleged Corruption. Reporting of public interest matters does not constitute sedition under Section 124A IPC unless there is incitement to violence or public disorder.

9 Apr 2021

The case involves nine criminal writ petitions filed by journalists and media persons (Sudheer Rikhari, Nikhil Vasudevan, Subhanshu Singh, Sumant Bala...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)