Search Results for "section 36(3)"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping in POCSO Case — Acquittal on Sexual Offences Stands. Appellant convicted under Section 363 IPC for taking a minor without consent, but acquitted of rape and sexual assault due to lack of credible evidence.

The appellant, Issub Khan, was convicted by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji for the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Confirms Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Preliminary decree for partition of 40 cents on eastern side upheld as plaintiff proved prior possession and joint ownership of well.

The second appeal was filed by the defendants against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court in a suit for declaration ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of newborn set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kamlabai Tukaram Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibaug in Sessions Case No.83 of 1994 for the offence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Voluntary Accompaniment by Minor. No 'Taking' Established Under Section 361 IPC as Minor Left Father's House of Her Own Free Will.

The appellants, Ashit s/o Adil Biswas, Madhav s/o Balram Gharami, and Suresh s/o Ramdas Bawankar (since abated), were convicted under Section 363 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit in Joint Hindu Family Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court and First Appellate Court Decrees. The court held that the plaintiff proved the existence of joint family business and properties, and the suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The case involves a dispute over partition of Joint Hindu Family properties. The plaintiff, Premsukh, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Saranjam Property Dispute. The court held that the Bombay Rent-Free Estates Act, 1852 and Exemptions from Land Revenue Acts, 1863 do not bar civil court jurisdiction over title and possession of Saranjam properties.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant no. 1 challenging an order dated 22 February 2005 passed by the Joint C...