Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of newborn set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kamlabai Tukaram Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibaug in Sessions Case No.83 of 1994 for the offence of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000, with default imprisonment of three months. She was also acquitted of the offence under Section 317 IPC (exposure and abandonment of a child under twelve years), and the State did not appeal that acquittal. The case arose from an incident on 10th November 1993, when a newborn female child was found alive near a bus stand in Sheva, Uran. The child was taken by Anant Gharat (PW-11) to his home, where his mother Hirabai (PW-6) cared for her. Hirabai informed the police that she had seen the appellant pregnant. The appellant and the child were taken to the Civil Hospital, Alibaug, where the child was later found dead. The postmortem report indicated death due to strangulation. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, primarily that the appellant was the mother of the child and that she caused the death. The High Court, in appeal, examined the evidence and found several inconsistencies and gaps. The medical evidence did not conclusively prove that the appellant had recently delivered a child. The witnesses' testimonies were contradictory regarding the appellant's pregnancy and the events at the hospital. The court held that the chain of circumstances was incomplete and did not unerringly point to the appellant's guilt. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant of the charge under Section 302 IPC.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence requires complete chain of circumstances pointing only to guilt of accused - In present case, prosecution failed to establish that appellant was mother of deceased child or that she caused death - Held that conviction cannot be sustained and appellant is entitled to acquittal (Paras 1-17).

B) Criminal Law - Infanticide - Abandonment of Child - Section 317 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant acquitted of offence under Section 317 IPC by trial court and no appeal filed by State - Held that acquittal under Section 317 IPC stands (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a newborn female child is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant acquitted of the charge under Section 302 IPC. Fine, if paid, to be refunded.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • chain of circumstances must be complete
  • benefit of doubt
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 317 IPC
  • infanticide
  • dying declaration
  • medical evidence
  • strangulation
  • last seen theory
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 22

Criminal Appeal No.363 of 1995

2020-08-11

R.D. Dhanuka, Surendra P. Tavade

Kishor Dattaram Walanju (for Appellant), Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh (for Respondent-State)

Kamlabai Tukaram Gharat

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction and sentence for murder of a newborn child.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by trial court for murder of a newborn female child; she appealed against the conviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and acquitted under Section 317 IPC; State did not appeal acquittal.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence. Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant caused the death of the newborn child.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and inconsistent, and that the chain of circumstances was incomplete. Respondent-State argued that the evidence established the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused. The prosecution failed to establish the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and lack of conclusive evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant-original accused has preferred this appeal against the Judgment and Order passed against her by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibaug in Sessions Case No.83 of 1994. The appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months. The appellant is acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 317 of the IPC.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and acquitted under Section 317 IPC. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.363 of 1995 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Judgment reserved on 12th March 2020 and pronounced on 11th August 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 317
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of newborn set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against APMC President for Violating Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(3) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966. The court held...