High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping in POCSO Case — Acquittal on Sexual Offences Stands. Appellant convicted under Section 363 IPC for taking a minor without consent, but acquitted of rape and sexual assault due to lack of credible evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Issub Khan, was convicted by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji for the offence of kidnapping under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50,000. He was acquitted of charges under Sections 376, 354, 452 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The prosecution alleged that on 17 February 2015, the appellant took a minor girl without the consent of her lawful guardian. The appellant appealed against the conviction, arguing that the minor had accompanied him voluntarily. The High Court of Bombay at Goa upheld the conviction, holding that even if the minor consented, the absence of the guardian's consent is sufficient for kidnapping under Section 363 IPC. The court found no reason to interfere with the trial court's findings on the kidnapping charge. The acquittal on sexual offences was not challenged by the state and thus remained undisturbed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Kidnapping - Section 363 IPC - Consent of Minor - The appellant was convicted for kidnapping a minor girl without consent of her lawful guardian. The court held that even if the minor accompanied voluntarily, the absence of guardian's consent constitutes kidnapping. (Paras 2-3)

B) Criminal Law - Sexual Offences - POCSO Act - Acquittal - The appellant was acquitted of offences under Sections 376, 354, 452 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act due to insufficient evidence and inconsistencies in the victim's testimony. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 363 IPC is sustainable and whether the acquittal under Sections 376, 354, 452 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act is correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction under Section 363 IPC upheld. Sentence of 3 years RI and fine of Rs. 50,000 maintained.

Law Points

  • Kidnapping
  • Consent of minor
  • Section 363 IPC
  • POCSO Act
  • Acquittal for sexual offences
  • Benefit of doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 180

Criminal Appeal No.9 of 2023

2025-09-29

Shreeram V. Shirsat, J.

2025:BHC-GOA:1847

Mr. Vibhav Amonkar for the Appellant, Mr. Shailendra G. Bhobe, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State

Issub Khan Son of Sayed Khan

State Through P.P. High Court of Bombay at Porvorim, Goa and The Police Inspector, Mapusa Police Station, Mapusa-Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for kidnapping and acquittal for sexual offences under POCSO Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal for the conviction under Section 363 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for kidnapping a minor girl without consent of her lawful guardian.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 363 IPC and acquitted him under Sections 376, 354, 452 IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 363 IPC is sustainable. Whether the acquittal under sexual offences is correct.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the minor accompanied him voluntarily, so no kidnapping. Prosecution argued that the minor was taken without guardian's consent.

Ratio Decidendi

For kidnapping under Section 363 IPC, the consent of the minor is irrelevant; the absence of consent of the lawful guardian is sufficient to constitute the offence.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an appeal against the conviction of the Accused/Appellant by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji vide Judgment and order dated 03.01.2023 passed in Sessions Case (ors) No. 76/2018, convicting the Accused/Appellant of the offences punishable under Section 363 of the IPC. The Accused/Appellant has been acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 376, 354, 452 of IPC and Section 4 and 8 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Fast Track Court (POCSO) at Panaji on 03.01.2023 in Sessions Case No. 76/2018. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which dismissed the appeal on 29.09.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 363, 376, 354, 452
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act): 4, 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Land Acquisition Apportionment Dispute — Appellant Fails to Prove Co-Tenancy. The court upheld the Reference Court's finding that neither party proved tenancy, and the compensation was payabl...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping in POCSO Case — Acquittal on Sexual Offences Stands. Appellant convicted under Section 363 IPC for taking a minor without consent, but acquitted of rape and sexual assault due to lack of...