Search Results for "section 33a"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Order Quashing Stamp Duty Demand as Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period. Sub-Registrar's Demand for Deficit Stamp Duty on Power of Attorney Treated as Conveyance Fails Due to Bar of Three-Year Limitation Under Section 33A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, allowing a writ petition filed by the respondent cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Levy of Deficit Stamp Duty Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Alternative remedy under Section 33A(3) held efficacious and writ not maintainable absent procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice.

The petitioner, a director of Sree Rajeswari Mill Ltd., executed a sale agreement dated 16.12.2020 in favor of one K. Rakesh Kumar for certain propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal, Quashes Stay Order on Transfer of Workmen. Conciliation Officer Held to Lack Jurisdiction to Stay Transfers Under Section 33A(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as Only Labour Courts Can Adjudicate.

The dispute arose from a transfer order issued by VIP Industries Limited, which transferred 140 workmen from its Nagpur plant to Sinnar and Haridwar u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Air India Challenging Rejection of Approval Application Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act — Withdrawal of Earlier Application and Reinstatement of Workman Bars Fresh Application for Approval of Dismissal Based on Same Misconduct.

The case involves a challenge by Air India Ltd. (the petitioner) against an order of the Presiding Officer of the National Industrial Tribunal at Mumb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement Order in Section 33A Complaint as Equivalent to Reference under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Industrial Tribunal Possesses Full Powers to Direct Reinstatement on Application Under Section 33A During Pendency of Dispute.

The dispute arose out of the retrenchment of an employee of a jute mill during the pendency of an industrial dispute. The appellant, a jute mill, was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...