Search Results for "section 141"

1016 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1016 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Directors Not in Charge of Company Affairs at Relevant Time. Section 138 NI Act Liability Requires Active Role in Business; Vicarious Liability Not Automatic for All Directors.

The petitioners, Heena Thirumali Sateesh and Hanumanth Inamdar, were directors of Hoysala Projects Private Limited. The respondent, M/s Minimelt Engin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Salt Land Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 4(2) of Salt Act, 1882. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Salt Commissioner Precludes Civil Court from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession of Salt Land.

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which confirmed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Vicarious Liability. Section 141 NI Act requires specific averment that the director was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business at the time of offence.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...