Search Results for "sealed bottles"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prohibition Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 66(2) Mandate. Failure to Send Sample Quantity for Chemical Analysis as Required by Section 66(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The applicant, Smt. Rozia Alex Trinedat, was convicted by the trial court under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for being in poss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Maharashtra Prohibition Act Case — Failure to Put CA Report Under Section 313 CrPC Not Fatal. Possession of 48 Bottles of Illicit Liquor Proved Through Recovery and Panch Witnesses, Conviction Under Section 65(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act Confirmed.

The applicant, Sau. Shobha Baburo Shende, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagbhid, under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Vendor for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil Upheld as Sample Not Representative and Rules 14 and 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Not Followed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bramhapuri, in Regular Criminal Case No.68 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Tax Collection Obligation on Mysore Sales Under Section 206C. Excise Contractors Deemed "Buyers" in Karnataka Liquor Vending Case, Appeal Dismissed

The application of Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor, particularly focusing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision of Accused in Food Adulteration Case — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused Failed to Prove Due Diligence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Kantilal Parasmal Jain, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Mens Rea and Active Participation. Joint Suicide Pact Does Not Amount to Abetment Under Section 306 IPC.

The case pertains to the death of actress Ms. Pratyusha, who consumed poison along with the appellant, Gudipalli Siddhartha Reddy, on 23rd February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...