Search Results for "sampling requirement"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Long Incarceration. The court held that the quantity of Codeine (200 grams) was less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), thus Section 37 NDPS Act not attracted, and granted bail considering the period of custody.

The applicant, Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Indonesian National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Search Procedures. Conviction for possession of 3.930 kg Methamphetamine set aside as prosecution failed to follow Section 52-A NDPS Act sampling requirements and Section 50 search safeguards.

The appellant, an Indonesian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for possession of 3.930 kg of Methamphetamine and sentenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Sampling Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector S.G. Dharme, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10/05/2000 passed by the 6th Judici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Sampling Irregularity. Non-Compliance with Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Separate Sampling from Two Bottles Leads to Acquittal Being Upheld.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 5/3/1993 of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court, Mazgaon, in Criminal Case N...