Search Results for "rule 11"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Fixation Dispute Under CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Rule 11 Applies When Employee Opts for Revised Pay from Date of ACP Upgradation, Not Rule 7.

The case involves a dispute over the correct rule for pay fixation under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. The respondent, Raj Kum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Grampanchayat Election Due to Old Bank Passbook. Returning Officer's Order Set Aside as Defect Was Curable Under Rule 11 of Grampanchayat Election Rules.

The petitioner, Chhaya w/o Gopal Gavhane, filed a nomination for election to the Grampanchayat, Mhalsapur, Taluka Sengaon, District Hingoli from Ward ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal, Reverses Counting of 50% Part-Time Service as Full Regular Service for Pension. Rule 11 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 Only Provides for Counting 50% of Temporary Service and Cannot be Expanded Beyond Its Stipulations.

The State of Tamil Nadu preferred an intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of a single Judge in WP No. 6480 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal on Counting Part-Time Service for Pension Under Rule 11 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. The Court Relied on a Common Judgment Holding that Rule 11’s Welfare Provision for Temporary Service Cannot Be Extended to Part-Time Panchayat Clerks.

Background: The present intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Principal Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Pension Matter — Part-Time Service Not Countable Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. Rule 11(2) and 11(4) Exclude Part-Time Employees from 50% Service Counting, and Erroneous Orders Cannot Be Perpetuated Under Article 14.

The dispute arose out of a claim by a former part-time Panchayat Clerk, S. Balakrishnan, who sought counting of 50% of his part-time service for pensi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows State Appeal Against Grant of Pension Benefit to Part-Time Panchayat Clerk. Counting of 50% Part-Time Service as Temporary Service for Pension Denied as Contrary to Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 and Full Bench Judgments.

The dispute pertained to the claim of a former Part-Time Panchayat Clerk for counting 50% of his service for pensionary benefits under the Tamil Nadu ...