Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Mamlatdar and Deputy Collector Orders for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions Under Mamlatdar’s Court Act, 1906. Ex parte Decree Set Aside as Mamlatdar Failed to Frame Issues, Record Evidence, and Prepare Panchnama and Map as Required by Law.

16 Mar 2026

The case arose from a dispute between adjacent landowners in Village Undrel, Taluka Daskroi, Ahmedabad. Respondent no.4, the owner of survey nos.413 a...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Mamlatdar's Order Granting Right of Way Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Existence of Way and Lack of Alternative Access. The Court declined to interfere with the Mamlatdar's order under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, as the appellants failed to show perversity or jurisdictional error.

12 Feb 2026

The appellants, Dhansukhbhai Jerambhai Prajapati and another, filed a Letters Patent Appeal before the Gujarat High Court challenging the judgment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against Mamlatdar's Order in Land Dispute Under Goa Mamlatdar's Court Act, 1966. Concurrent findings of possession and title by Mamlatdar and Additional District Magistrate upheld as no perversity or error of law found.

23 Dec 2021

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the original defendants in a suit/application under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mamlatdar's Court Act,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Mamlatdar and Collector Cannot Be Reversed Without Perversity.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Mrs. Antoneta Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses LPA Against Single Judge's Order Setting Aside Administrative Tribunal's Rejection of Section 8A Application Under Goa Mundkars Act. Finding that Prior Summary Inquiry Under Section 29 Does Not Bar a Fresh Declaration Under Section 8A, Division Bench Directs Mamlatdar to Decide Mundkarial Rights on Merits.

25 Sep 2018

The case arose from a dispute over mundkarial rights under the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The respondents claim...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.

4 May 2018

The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tenancy Declarations and Sale of Agricultural Properties Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to orders from 1988-1996 under Goa Tenancy Act fails as petition filed in 2013 is grossly delayed without explanation.

17 Apr 2014

The petitioner, Rashid Salvador Sousa, filed a writ petition in April 2013 under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bom...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Orders Declaring Tenant Not a Tenant Due to Lack of Jurisdiction of Mamlatdar. Mamlatdar Held Not Appointed Under Section 2(15) of Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964, Rendering Orders Nullity.

27 Sep 2013

Two writ petitions were filed by the legal heirs of Ganesh Rama Gaonkar and Smt. Shevanti Govind Gaonkar challenging the orders of the Mamlatdar of Ca...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mundkar Declaration — Upholds Concurrent Findings That Petitioners Failed to Prove Mundkar Status Under Section 8A of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant and the concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

12 Oct 2012

The petitioners, Shri Vassant Krishna Palyekar and Smt. Vanita V. Palyekar, filed a writ petition challenging the common judgment and order dated 05.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Reference to Mamlatdar for Tenancy Determination in Land Dispute. The court held that the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to decide tenancy issues and must refer them to the Mamlatdar under Section 58 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964.

14 Oct 2011

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/02/2000 passed in Special Civil Suit No.108/1979, whereby the learned Judge ordere...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)