Search Results for "retrospective regularization"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees in Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship — One-Time Measure Under Umadevi Principles. Appellants appointed prior to 31.12.2001 and serving for over 10 years held entitled to regularization despite interim orders.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Rajnish Kumar Mishra and others, who were ad-hoc employees of the Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship in Uttar Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking De-reservation of Lecturer Post and Regularization of Services. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to de-reservation or regularization under Government Resolution dated 5th December 1994.

The petitioner, Varsha Manohar Dhongade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularisation of Daily Wager in Industrial Dispute — No Employer-Employee Relationship Established with State. Claim for Regularisation Fails as Petitioner Worked Under Private Contractor, Not Under State or Its Instrumentality.

The petitioner, Rajesh Anantray Ravl, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal of Employees Union in ONGC Regularization Case. Court Holds That Irregularly Appointed Term Employees Are Entitled to Regularization from Date of Initial Appointment but Only Notional Benefits Retrospectively and Actual Pay from Date of High Court Order.

The dispute arose from the appointment of about 800 term-based employees by Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) between 1999 and 2001 for Class III a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Seniority and Promotion Rights in Service Regularization Dispute - Continuity of Service Entitles Counting of Retrenched Period for Promotion Without Monetary Benefits Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from the appointments of the respondents as Assistant Managers on contract in 2000, which were regularized in 2006 under the Ke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pay Protection in Regularization Case — Tribunal's Order Modified to Protect Last Pay Drawn. Pay Fixation Must Consider Last Pay Drawn Before Regularization Under Service Law Principles.

The petitioners, originally engaged as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized in service. They filed Original Application No.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CAT Order on Pay Fixation for Regularized Employees. Court holds that last pay drawn before regularization must be protected and seniority must be counted from initial appointment as casual labourers.

The petitioners, who were initially appointed as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized after several years. They filed Origina...