Search Results for "retiral benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "retiral benefits"

444 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 444 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retiral Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Invalidated Tribe Claim — Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Withheld for Invalid Caste Claim After Superannuation. The court held that the right to pension is a right earned by past service and cannot be forfeited after retirement under Rule 27 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Mahadeorao Ukande, was appointed as an Observer in the India Meteorological Department on 19.11.1986 against a post reserve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Posts — Holds That Denial of Pensionary Benefits to Employees Who Rendered Decades of Service Is Arbitrary and Violative of Social Justice Principles. The Court ruled that temporary status casual labourers treated at par with temporary Group D employees are entitled to pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, and regularisation is not a precondition.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves three appeals by former casual labourers (Night Guards) of the Department of Posts, or their legal representatives, who challenged t...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Superannuated Employee for Retiral Benefits with Interest - Disciplinary Proceedings Abate Upon Superannuation Under Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971, and Punishment Order Passed After Retirement Is Without Jurisdiction.

3 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Harikrishna Mohanlal Thakkar, was serving as Chief General Manager with the Gujarat State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. He was subject...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

1 Jan 2026

The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Former State Chief Information Commissioner Seeking Pension and Retiral Benefits. Section 16(5) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 does not extend pensionary benefits to State Chief Information Commissioners as the phrase 'other terms and conditions of service' is limited to salary and allowances during tenure.

1 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Shri Prashant S. P. Tendolkar, a retired State Chief Information Commissioner (SCIC) of Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

19 Apr 2024

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired MIDC Employee Challenging Initiation of Enquiry After Superannuation and Withholding of Retiral Benefits. Disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated after retirement without specific service rule provision; retiral benefits cannot be withheld without following procedure under Rule 9(1) of MIDC Employees' Pension Rules, 1987.

8 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Pratapsinh Kedar Patil, was an employee of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) who served for over 33 years and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Awards in Favor of Retrenched Municipal Workers — Daily Wage Employees Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity and Back Wages. Municipal Corporation's Challenge Dismissed as Workers Were Denied Benefits Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Long Service.

6 Apr 2016

The Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation (petitioner) filed multiple writ petitions challenging common awards passed by the Labour Court, Ahmednagar, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

10 Dec 2013

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)