Search Results for "remand not empty formality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "remand not empty formality"

78 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka partly allowed Criminal Petition Challenging Arrest and Remand of Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case - Illegality in not providing grounds of arrest in the language known to the petitioners

4 Mar 2026

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by two Nigerian citizens challenging their arrest and remand in a narcotics c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days. Mere 'Seen' Remark on Application Under Section 316(5) BNS Does Not Constitute Valid Extension of Remand Under Section 187(3) BNSS.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days and Lack of Speaking Order for Remand Extension. The court held that the mere remark 'seen' on an application under Section 316(5) BNS does not satisfy the requirement of a reasoned order under Section 187(3) BNSS, entitling the accused to default bail.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Bail and Quashes Police Custody Remand Orders in Prison Corruption Case. Petitioner's Husband, a Police Constable, Granted Bail on Conditions as Investigation Complete and No Further Custodial Interrogation Required.

6 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Sadhana Rathod, wife of arrested accused Ajinkya Rathod, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Extension Orders and Grants Default Bail to Accused in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case Due to Procedural Violation. The Court held that production of accused before the Special Court when considering Public Prosecutor's report for extension of investigation period under Section 20(2) of the 2015 Act is mandatory, and non-compliance renders extension orders illegal, entitling accused to default bail under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

23 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by accused persons charged under the Gujarat Control of T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Violation of Natural Justice as Contractor Not Heard Before Termination of Contract. The Court Held That Principles of Natural Justice Require a Hearing Before Cancelling a Contract Awarded Through Tender, Even If Financial Irregularities Are Alleged.

11 Dec 2020

The case involves appeals by the State of Uttar Pradesh against a High Court judgment that set aside the cancellation of a contract awarded to Sudhir ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Determines Factual Enquiry Whether Share Transfer Resulted in Members Exceeding Fifty. Enquiry Directed by Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014 Following Dispute Over Validity of Pre-emption Rights in Articles of Association.

4 Aug 2017

The appeal was placed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay following a remand order by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 2481 of 2014. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Specific Performance Suit — Lower Appellate Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits. Remand Under Order XLI Rule 23 CPC Requires Satisfaction of Conditions; Appellate Court Cannot Remand Without Deciding Appeal on Merits.

6 Mar 2013

The appellant, Subhash Moralwar, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondents, Vilas Wankhede and others, in the trial co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Compromise Decree Dispute — Regular Civil Appeal Not Maintainable Against Consent Decree Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. The Court held that a consent decree cannot be challenged by a regular appeal and the lower appellate court's remand order was without jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2012

The appellant, Ramesh Balaji Ekhande, original plaintiff no.5, challenged the judgment dated 17.3.2008 passed by the District Judge-3, Nasik in Civil ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)