Search Results for "regular parole"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "regular parole"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Parole Eligibility Rule in Negotiable Instruments Act Case. Rule 14 of Maharashtra Prisons (Furlough and Parole) Rules, 2024 requiring one year actual imprisonment for parole eligibility held valid; petitioner convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not entitled to parole before completing one year.

4 May 2026

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Chellappan Pillai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Circu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Parole Order for Convict in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Arbitrary Rejection and Delay in Execution. Rejection of permanent parole on ground of not applying for regular parole held unsustainable; delay in implementing High Court order violates Article 21.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Daulal, was convicted for offences under Sections 148, 448, 304 Part II read with 149, and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Petition Against Cancellation of Emergency Parole Due to Substitution of Rule 19. Cancellation Order Set Aside as State's Affidavit Revealed Rule 19 Was Substituted After the Impugned Order.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Sachin @ Anna Daniel Gabrel, a life convict for offences under Sections 302, 149, 148, and 143 of the Indian Penal Code, was undergoin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Furlough Grant to Convict in Rape Case Due to Threat to Witnesses and Public Order. Furlough is not an absolute right but subject to conditions under the Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules, 1959, and must consider witness safety and public peace, as the convict had a criminal network and history of witness intimidation.

20 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Gujarat dated 24 June 2021, which directed the release of the respondent on furlough. The respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

25 Jan 2021

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict Despite Police Objection Based on Past Good Conduct. The court held that parole is a statutory right and rejection based on vague apprehension of absconding without material is unsustainable under Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules.

3 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pande, a life convict undergoing imprisonment since 2010 for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Petition, Directs Appellate Authorities to Pass Speaking Orders in Parole and Furlough Matters. The court held that appellate orders rejecting furlough or parole must be reasoned to enable judicial review, and set aside a cryptic order rejecting the petitioner's furlough appeal.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, a convict under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, lodged in Amravati Central Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole to Convict in POCSO and Rape Case for Father's Funeral. Rejection of Parole Solely on Ground of Heinous Offence Without Adverse Report Held Arbitrary Under Rule 19(1) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

3 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Baburao Marotrao Dakhore, was convicted by the Learned Sessions Court, Hingoli for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(H)(I)(N) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Parole Extension for Convict Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough & Parole) Rules, 1959 — Rule 25 Confers Discretion to Extend Parole Up to 90 Days. The court held that failure to consider discretion under Rule 25 amounts to failure to exercise jurisdiction, directing authority to reconsider application.

11 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Amit son of Gajanan Gandhi, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, N...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)