Search Results for "registration estoppel"

352 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 352 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Family Settlement Memorandum Registration. Court holds that memorandum recording pre-existing family arrangement does not require registration under Indian Registration Act, 1908, and parties acting upon it are estopped from resiling.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a second appeal, which reversed the first appellate court's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance and Mesne Profits. Notarized but Unregistered Agreement to Sell Held Void Under Registration Act, 1908.

The present appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree dated 08.05.2024 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Second Appeal in Lease Dispute — No Registered Lease Deed, No Protection Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act. Appellant failed to prove possession in part performance of contract as lessee failed to execute registered lease deed despite 1965 agreement.

The appellant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), filed a second appeal against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and the first appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Case Due to Binding Consent Decrees — Competent Authority Cannot Override Civil Court Decrees. Consent Decree Operates as Res Judicata and Estoppel Between Parties Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, owner of a larger property, had constructed a building and sold flats to purchasers who formed Respondent No. 2 Society. The Petitione...