Search Results for "registered user"

840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Petitioners in Commercial Arbitration Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Exclusive Rights to Manufacture Ice Cream Under 'Vadilal' Brand in Designated Territories Preserved Pending Arbitration Arising from 1993 Family Settlement.

Shailesh R. Gandhi, Bela S. Gandhi, and Vadilal Dairy International Limited (formerly Super Milk Makers Private Limited) filed a petition under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act but Reduces Damages — LIC vs NIC Dispute Over Flat Occupancy. The court held that the Appellate Authority's reduction of damages and stay on execution pending High Power Committee decision was justified, but eviction order was valid.

The dispute involves two public sector undertakings: Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the owner of a flat, and National Insurance Company Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in Maize Import License Dispute — Actual User Condition Not Violated. Petitioner Trading House Allowed to Import Maize Through Canalizing Agency Without Being Actual User Under Foreign Trade Policy.

The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a trading house incorporated in 1919 and engaged in export of rice, oil seed, food grains and puls...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...