Search Results for "refundable security deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "refundable security deposit"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Licensee Cannot Claim Right to Continue Occupation After Expiry of License Term. The Court held that a licensee must vacate upon expiry of the license period and cannot resist eviction by claiming additional security deposit or improvements without proof.

5 May 2026

The Petitioner, Mohammed Arbaaz Aziz Farooqui, was a licensee of Flat No. 143, B-Wing, 14th floor, Heera Panna CHS, Tulsiwadi, Mumbai, under a registe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Part, Sets Aside Trial Court's Rejection of Rent Arrears Claim in Eviction Suit. The court held that the claim for arrears of rent from 01.04.2000 to 30.11.2021 was not barred by limitation as the tenancy continued and the suit was filed within three years from termination.

19 Dec 2025

The appellants, Smt. Sarojamma and others, filed a commercial suit (Com.O.S.No.124/2023) before the LXXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Release of Goods Withheld by Warehousing Service Provider. Court directs release of goods upon payment of admitted storage charges, holding that a bailee cannot retain goods for disputed amounts beyond the contract.

23 Mar 2023

The Petitioner, Direct Logistics and Export Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong-based trading and logistics company, entered into a Service Agreement dated 21.06.20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

6 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment in Development Agreement Case — Revenue Sharing Arrangement Not Constituting Conveyance. Interest-free refundable deposit and revenue sharing in development agreement held not to be consideration for transfer of property under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Godrej Properties Ltd. (GP), entered into a development agreement with Goldbricks Infrastructure Private Ltd. (GIPL) on 30.09.2011 for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Security Deposit Recovery Suit — Triable Issues Raised on Forfeiture Clause and Interest Claim. Leave and Licence Agreement's Clause 14(c) Permitting Forfeiture of Deposit for Overstay Creates Triable Issue, Precluding Summary Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.

21 Mar 2006

The plaintiff, RMC Readymix (I) P.ltd, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Kanayo Khubcha...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)