Search Results for "reanalysis"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil. Conviction and Sentence of 3 Months RI and Fine of Rs.1000 Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Revision.

The applicant, Santoshkumar Ramchandra Rathi, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha, on 17.9.1999 in Regular Criminal Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Breach of Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 and Contradictory Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by the original accused, Ibrahimbhai Kalabhai, challenging his conviction under the Prevent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case Due to Inordinate Delay Depriving Right to Reanalysis. Delay of 35 months in filing complaint violated Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, rendering trial futile.

The applicants, who were directors of M/s. Bunge Agri Business India Ltd., filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Mineral Oil as Foreign Matter Must Exceed 3% Limit Under Rule 44AAA. Clause A.05.17 of Appendix B to Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 permits extraneous matter up to 3% by weight, and mineral oil falls within that category.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Mangala Badkhal, proprietor of M/s. Sweta Spices Industries, for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Belated Filing After Expiry of Best Before Date. Right Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Frustrated as Complaint Filed 16 Months After Best Before Date.

The applicant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing company, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Non-Consensual Nature of Relationship.

The appellant, Pravin Popat Kharat, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC and Section ...