Search Results for "rash or negligent act"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against BESCOM Engineers in Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Rash or Negligent Act. Section 304A IPC requires proof of gross negligence directly causing death, not mere failure of duty.

The petitioners, Sri Sreeramu V. and Subramanya T., who are Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer respectively at BESCOM's Whitefield Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Anticipatory Bail Application Rejected in Fatal Drunken Driving Case. Court Denies MBA Graduate's Bail Amid Evidence of Reckless Driving and Alcohol Consumption

Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Crime No. 122/2024, involving a fatal accident. Initially cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...