Search Results for "railway compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "railway compensation"

506 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEB's Appeal and Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Goods Damage Claim — Railway Administration Held Liable for Negligence in Transit. Carrier's Duty of Care Under Section 72 of Railways Act, 1989 Requires Proof of Reasonable Care; Failure to Provide Open Wagon Cover or Proper Handling Constitutes Negligence.

8 May 2014

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a common judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, concerning damage to a consignment of elect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. in Railway Short Delivery Case — Burden of Proof Under Section 65 of Railways Act, 1989 Not Discharged by Railway Administration. Shortage Receipt Issued at Delivery Station May Amount to Admission of Shortage, and Mere Remarks on Railway Receipt Do Not Prove Non-Supervision of Loading.

13 Feb 2014

The appellant, M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a government enterprise, booked a consignment of 27,020 litres of motor spirit at its siding ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

2 Aug 2017

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Vendor's Family — Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration failed to prove the exception of self-inflicted injury, and the death of a passenger selling articles in a train is an untoward incident attracting strict liability.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Clai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Railway Accident Death Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Bona Fide Passenger Presumption Applies When Ticket Found on Body. The court held that the death of a passenger who fell from a train due to jolting and crowd is an untoward incident, and the railway is strictly liable to pay compensation.

5 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the claimants (widow and children of the deceased) against the dismissal of their compensation claim by the Railway Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Valid Ticket Recovery Establishes 'Untoward Incident' Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Court held that recovery of a valid ticket from the deceased's body shifts the burden on the railway to prove that the death was not an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

5 Feb 2015

The appellant, Smt. Nirmala Pravinchandra Soni, mother of the deceased Kiran Pravinchandra Soni, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mum...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Railway Appeal in Goods Loss Case — Non-Declaration of Value Does Not Bar Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The court held that the railway administration, as a bailee, is liable for loss of goods even if the consignor did not declare their value, and the burden of proof to show reasonable care or exception lies on the railway.

13 Feb 2014

The respondent, M/s Satya Sai Exports, booked a consignment of shed antlers of Sambhar and Chital weighing 240 kilogrammes under Railway Receipt No. F...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

27 Jan 2016

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Passenger Death Case Due to Untoward Incident. Deceased Boarded Wrong Train but Was Bona Fide Passenger with Valid Ticket; Railway Liable Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

2 Aug 2013

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, General Manager, South Central Railway, against the judgment and award dated 06/03/2009 of the Railway Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

22 Feb 2005

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)