Search Results for "provisional duty"

327 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 327 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case. Principles of Unjust Enrichment Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 Not Applicable to Refund Arising on Finalisation of Provisional Assessment.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II appealed against the order of the appellate authorities below which allowed the refund claim of M/s. Sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Interest Case — No Interest on Delayed DCRG and CVP When Judicial Proceedings Were Pending at Retirement. Rule 4 of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 disentitles commutation during pendency of judicial proceedings.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Chief General Manager, Gujarat Telecom Circle, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and others against the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Administrator in Co-operative Bank Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as passed without notice or hearing.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging an order dated 21st December 2004 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-opera...