Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Administrator in Co-operative Bank Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as passed without notice or hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 63
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging an order dated 21st December 2004 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The order appointed an administrator for the Mumbai District Central Co-operative Bank for six months. The petitioners were directors of the bank. The background involved an election to the Board of Directors held on 24th June 1999, with the term due to expire on 4th July 2004. The bank had requested the Collector to initiate elections, but the State Government postponed elections due to parliamentary elections. The Divisional Joint Registrar passed the impugned order without issuing any notice or affording a hearing to the directors. The legal issue was whether such an order could be sustained without compliance with natural justice. The court found that the order was manifestly inconsistent with law and in excess of jurisdiction, as Section 77A requires adherence to principles of natural justice. The court set aside the order and allowed the petitions.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Appointment of Administrator - Section 77A Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Natural Justice - The Divisional Joint Registrar appointed an administrator for the Mumbai District Central Co-operative Bank without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing to the Board of Directors. The Court held that such an order is manifestly inconsistent with the provisions of law and in excess of jurisdiction under Section 77A, as the power under Section 77A must be exercised in conformity with principles of natural justice. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 appointing an administrator without issuing notice or affording an opportunity of hearing is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and set aside the order dated 21st December 2004 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Section 77A Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Appointment of administrator
  • Notice and hearing
  • Jurisdictional error
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (01) 122

WRIT PETITION LD.NO.3479 OF 2004 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.30 OF 2005

2005-01-24

DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

Mr.Shekhar Naphade, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.S. Desai, Mr.Vijay Mane and Mr. R.S. Ghadge for the Petitioners (in W.P. Ld. No.3479/2004); Mr.C. J. Sawant, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for Respondent No.2 to 6 (in W.P. Ld. No.3479/2004); Mr.M. N. Bhadrashete for the Petitioners (in W.P. No.30/2005); Mr. C.J. Sawant, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 17 (in W.P. No.30/2005)

Nandkumar Mansing Katkar & Ors. (in W.P. Ld. No.3479/2004); Chandrakant Mukutrao Khopde & Anr. (in W.P. No.30/2005)

Mumbai District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors. (in W.P. Ld. No.3479/2004); The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-op. Societies, Mumbai & Ors. (in W.P. No.30/2005)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Divisional Joint Registrar appointing an administrator for a co-operative bank.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners, directors of the bank, sought to quash the order dated 21st December 2004 appointing an administrator.

Filing Reason

The order was passed without issuing notice or affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Divisional Joint Registrar passed the impugned order on 21st December 2004 under Section 77A of the Act.

Issues

Whether the order under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 appointing an administrator without notice or hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the order was passed without notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The respondents did not contest the lack of notice, as it was common ground.

Ratio Decidendi

The power under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 must be exercised in conformity with principles of natural justice. An order appointing an administrator without issuing notice or affording an opportunity of hearing is manifestly inconsistent with law and in excess of jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

the order which has been passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar is manifestly inconsistent with the provisions of law and in excess of his jurisdiction under Section 77A. it is common ground, was without issuing a notice under the provisions of Section 77A or furnishing an opportunity of being heard.

Procedural History

The Divisional Joint Registrar passed an order on 21st December 2004 under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 appointing an administrator for the Mumbai District Central Co-operative Bank. The petitioners, directors of the bank, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order. The court heard the petitions and delivered judgment on 24th January 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 77A, Section 73G, Section 73 IB, Chapter XIA
  • Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies (Election to Committees) Rules, 1971:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Administrator in Co-operative Bank Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 77A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside as passed without notice or hearing.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of Pre-deposit in Customs Appeal — Pre-deposit Amounts Refundable with Interest from Date of Deposit When Appeal Succeeds. The Court held that pre-deposit made under Section 112 of Customs Act, 19...