Search Results for "prosecutrix testimony"

287 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 287 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 69 of 2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli. The appellant in Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 354, 323 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajay Dhengre, was convicted by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No.48/2016 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 323 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Santosh Deelip Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, for offenses under Sections 376 and 323 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Angad Tikaram Chandane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 417 (cheating) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Trafficking of Minor Bangladeshi Girl for Prostitution Case. Testimony of Victim Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Circumstances Under Sections 366-A IPC, 4 and 5 of PITA, and Section 8(9) of Goa Children's Act.

The case involves an appeal against conviction of Smt. Anju Shah for offences under Sections 342, 323, 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent with Medical Report and Circumstances.

The appellant, Rattan Suka Lilke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Section 366 read with Section 34 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Maroti Shivram Nilekar and Shamrao Murlidhar Thuse, under Section 376(2)(g) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...