Search Results for "promotion orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "promotion orders"

1920 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1920 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Postal Department in Promotion Dispute — Merit List Division-Specific, Not Common Across Divisions. The Court held that the respondent, an Extra Departmental Delivery Agent from Banda Division, was not entitled to promotion as Postman against vacancies in Kanpur Head Post Offices because the merit list was division-specific and vacancies were to be filled from local divisions.

6 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Postman from Extra Departmental Delivery Agents. The appellants, the Superintendent of Post ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Directs Consideration of Promotion for Store Keeper in Health Services - Petitioner's Case for Senior Store Keeper Post to be Examined Under 1991 Recruitment Rules

12 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Kum Shabana Bi Sayyed, was appointed as a Store Keeper (Medical Store Depot) on 3.3.2006 against a clear vacancy in the Directorate of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sealed Cover Procedure in Promotion — Petitioner Entitled to Promotion with Notional Benefits from Date of Junior's Promotion. Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When Disciplinary Proceedings Are Initiated After DPC Meeting; Employee Exonerated Entitled to Promotion from Date Junior Promoted.

5 Jul 2023

The petitioner, an employee of United India Insurance Company Limited, was considered for promotion by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) in 201...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition of SC Fire Officer for Promotion to ADFO Post. Post-Based Roster Implementation Requires Adjustment of Past Appointments Under Office Memorandum 02.07.1997.

27 Feb 2026

The writ petition was filed by A. Suresh, a Station Officer in the Fire Services Department, Government of Puducherry, who belongs to the Scheduled Ca...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Employee Challenging Industrial Court Order Directing Promotion of Qualified Employees with Retrospective Effect. Promotion of Unqualified Employee Set Aside as Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

21 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Rama Khobragade, an employee of the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board, challenged an order dated 14.07.1995 passed by the In...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Retrospective Promotion as Deputy Block Development Officer; Administrative Delay in Regularization Cannot Prejudice Employee's Right to Promotion. Employee Cannot Be Denied Promotion for Lack of Service Qualification When Department Failed to Provide Posting, and Administrative Delay Rendered Him Otherwise Eligible.

20 Mar 2025

The petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds as Junior Assistant in 2007 after his father died in harness in 2001. His services were regulari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Challenge in Port Trust Service Matter — Adverse Remarks Must Be Communicated Before Being Considered for Promotion. Uncommunicated adverse remarks cannot be used to deny promotion to Assistant Traffic Manager under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

25 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Manuel Lourenco D'Costa, was an employee of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao (respondent No.1). He was appointed as a Cle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Policy and Seniority Rules. The court held that promotions must follow the prescribed reservation policy and consider seniority, and directed reconsideration of promotions.

20 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Narendra Barde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the promotion of Respondent Nos. 2 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reversion and Orders Promotion in Service Law Case — Seniority-cum-Merit Principle Violated by Non-Communication of Adverse Confidential Reports. Reversion order without reasons and promotion of juniors without considering seniority and without communicating adverse reports set aside.

8 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Chimanrao Morbaji Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) an order of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former JFO Seeking Promotion Parity with HPOs — Holds That Carpet Scheme and Marketing Scheme Officers Belong to Separate Cadres with Distinct Promotion Channels. The appellant, originally appointed as JFO in the Carpet Scheme and later redesignated as CTO, was not entitled to be treated as HPO or granted promotions in the HPO channel, as the two schemes constitute separate cadres.

16 Jul 2025

The appellant, Rampat Azad, was appointed as a Junior Field Officer (JFO) in the Carpet Weaving Training Centre under the All India Handicrafts Board ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)