Search Results for "promotion bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "promotion bar"

604 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

1 Aug 2026

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Promotion to Law Officer Post in Municipal Corporation — Petitioner Not Entitled to Promotion as Appointment Was by Direct Recruitment and Petitioner Did Not Meet Eligibility Criteria.

12 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Sanghmitra R. Sandansing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to promote her to t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.

13 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council of India's Authority to Mandate Post-Enrolment Examination in Advocates Act Case. Constitution Bench Held That Pre-Enrolment Training and Examination Cannot Be Reintroduced After Statutory Omission, But Post-Enrolment Examination Under Section 49(1)(ah) Is Valid to Ensure Legal Profession Standards.

10 Feb 2023

The dispute originated from an application by Bonnie Foi Law College for affiliation to conduct legal studies, which led the Supreme Court to appoint ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Accelerated Promotion for Degree-Holding Junior Engineers in Uttarakhand Irrigation Department. The court held that the 7.33% accelerated promotion quota for Degree-holders is valid under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, as it is based on intelligible differentia and has a rational nexus with the object of encouraging higher qualifications.

14 Oct 2019

The dispute pertains to the Irrigation Department cadre of the Uttarakhand State, concerning promotion from Junior Engineer (JE) to Assistant Engineer...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Between Direct Recruits and Promotees in District Judge Cadre; Examines Application of 40-Point Roster System under Maharashtra Judicial Services (Seniority) Rules 2007. The vexed issue of seniority between direct recruits and promotees once again engages the Court; the Writ Petition challenges the Final Approved Seniority List dated 11-09-2015.

25 Oct 2018

Background: The case pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 filed by fourteen judicial officers holding various posts in the subordinate judici...

High Court

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

3 Apr 2014

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Service and Promotion Related Writ Petitions Filed by Several District Judges. The Petitions Challenge Certain Decisions of the Department of Law and Administrative Reforms Concerning Judicial Officers' Seniority and Promotion.

27 Sep 2013

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)