Search Results for "pillion rider negligence"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimants' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation Dismissed as Deceased Pedestrian Found 50% Contributory to Accident.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.05.2011 at about 8.30 p.m. near Mallaghatta Gate, Kunigal Town, Tumkur District. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was 30-year-old earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's assessment of income and multiplier modified.

The appellants, original claimants in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.26 of 2011, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 23.10.2012 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Cannot Be Held Guilty of Contributory Negligence. The court held that a pillion rider has no control over the vehicle and cannot be attributed negligence unless there is specific evidence of active intervention.

The appellant, a pillion rider on a motorcycle, was injured in an accident involving a tractor. He filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced. Standalone Own Damage Policy Does Not Cover Third Party Liability.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on February 11, 2022, when the deceased, Meena, was riding as a pillion on a motorcycle driven by ...