High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Pillion Rider. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. B. Krishnappa Setty & Others, MFA No. 9140/2010 (MV) - Insurance company appeals against award of Rs. 2,58,000/- for death of pillion rider; court finds contributory negligence and reduces compensation by 50%.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the insurance company against the judgment and award dated 09.12.2009 passed by the MACT, Mangalore, in MVC No. 658/2008, awarding compensation of Rs. 2,58,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. to the claimants, who are the parents of the deceased Avinash Shetty. The accident occurred on 24.04.2007 at about 5.30 p.m. when the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle bearing Regn.No.KA-19 V-7113 ridden by Kishore Kumar (respondent no.3). The rider drove the motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner, lost control, and the vehicle capsized, causing fatal injuries to the pillion rider. The claimants filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The MACT awarded compensation. The insurance company appealed, contending that the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence as he knowingly sat on a motorcycle driven by a person without a valid driving license and without wearing a helmet. The court analyzed the evidence and found that the pillion rider was aware that the rider had no license and did not wear a helmet, which contributed to the accident. The court held that the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 50%. Consequently, the court reduced the compensation by 50%, awarding Rs. 1,29,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Contributory Negligence - Pillion Rider - Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The appeal challenged the award of compensation for the death of a pillion rider in a motor accident. The court held that the pillion rider, by sitting on a motorcycle driven by a person without a valid driving license and by not wearing a helmet, contributed to the accident. The court reduced the compensation by 50% on account of contributory negligence. (Paras 5-8)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Reduction - Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The MACT had awarded Rs. 2,58,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. The High Court, finding contributory negligence, reduced the compensation to Rs. 1,29,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence and whether the compensation awarded by the MACT is excessive.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation reduced from Rs. 2,58,000/- to Rs. 1,29,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Pillion rider negligence
  • Reduction of compensation
  • Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (07) 40

MFA No. 9140 of 2010 (MV)

2019-07-08

K. Somashekar

Smt. H R Renuka for Appellant, Sri. Sri C R Patil for R-1 and R-2

Bajaj Allainz General Insurance Company Ltd.

B Krishnappa Setty, B Varija Setty, Kishore Kumar, Devadas

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation awarded by MACT

Filing Reason

Insurance company contended that the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence

Previous Decisions

MACT awarded Rs. 2,58,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No. 658/2008

Issues

Whether the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence? Whether the compensation awarded by the MACT is excessive?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the pillion rider knowingly sat on a motorcycle driven by a person without a valid driving license and without wearing a helmet, contributing to the accident. Respondents argued that the rider was solely negligent and the pillion rider had no control over the vehicle.

Ratio Decidendi

A pillion rider who knowingly rides with a person without a valid driving license and without wearing a helmet is guilty of contributory negligence, and the compensation is to be reduced proportionately.

Judgment Excerpts

The pillion rider was aware that the rider had no driving license and did not wear a helmet, which contributed to the accident. The court held that the pillion rider was guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 50%.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed under Section 166 of MV Act before MACT, Mangalore, which awarded compensation. Insurance company appealed under Section 173(1) of MV Act to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173(1), Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Pillion Rider. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. B. Krishnappa Setty & Others, MFA No. 9140/2010 (MV) - Insurance company appeals aga...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeals in Gold Smuggling Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Violations. Confiscation of Gold and Imposition of Penalties Set Aside for Failure to Prove Smuggling Beyond Reasonable Doubt.