Search Results for "permanent unfitness"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Medical Unfitness Declaration for Driver Post Due to Presternal Keloid Chest. Court holds that keloid is not a disqualifying condition for driving and directs BRO to reconsider petitioner's candidature.

The petitioner, Sayyad Naim Ali Kachruddin, applied for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) with the Border Roads Organisation (B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Ex-Sepoy Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board; failure renders discharge illegal.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was placed in permanent Low Medical Category...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Washerman Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board recommendation; residual clause (v) inapplicable.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was discharged from service on August 31, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Family Pension Claim for Widow of Army Jawan Discharged Without Invalidation Medical Board. Discharge on Medical Grounds Requires Invalidation Board Under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954; Residual Provision Not Applicable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) at its Principal Bench, New Delhi, which dismissed the Original Application filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Termination with Retrospective Effect. Termination of Employee with Retrospective Effect from Date of Medical Unfitness Held Illegal as It Deprives Employee of Opportunity to Be Heard.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 22.08.2017 allowing Complaint ...