Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Medical Unfitness Declaration for Driver Post Due to Presternal Keloid Chest. Court holds that keloid is not a disqualifying condition for driving and directs BRO to reconsider petitioner's candidature.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sayyad Naim Ali Kachruddin, applied for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) with the Border Roads Organisation (BRO). He cleared the physical efficiency test, practical test, and written test, and was provisionally selected. However, during the medical examination on 18 February 2019, he was declared permanently medically unfit due to 'Presternal Keloid Chest' - a scar tissue over the chest bone. The Medical Review Board confirmed this on 4 May 2019. The petitioner challenged this decision before the Bombay High Court, arguing that the condition was minor and did not affect his ability to drive. The court examined whether the medical standard was reasonable and proportionate. It noted that the keloid was a cosmetic issue and did not impair driving functions. The court held that the disqualification was arbitrary, lacking rational nexus to job requirements, and violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The petition was allowed, the medical unfitness declaration was set aside, and the respondents were directed to reconsider the petitioner's candidature.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Medical Unfitness - Presternal Keloid Chest - Disqualification for Driver Post - The petitioner was declared permanently medically unfit for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport due to a presternal keloid, which is a scar tissue over the chest bone. The court held that the condition does not impair driving ability and the decision was arbitrary and disproportionate. (Paras 1-12)

B) Constitutional Law - Articles 14 and 16 - Reasonable Classification - The court examined whether the medical standard excluding persons with keloid from driver posts was reasonable. It found no rational nexus between the condition and the requirements of the job, thus violating equality clauses. (Paras 8-12)

C) Administrative Law - Doctrine of Proportionality - The court applied the proportionality test to the medical unfitness declaration, concluding that the condition was minor and did not affect job performance, rendering the decision disproportionate. (Paras 10-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the declaration of the petitioner as 'Permanently Medical Unfit' for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) on account of 'Presternal Keloid Chest' is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned decision declaring the petitioner permanently medically unfit is set aside. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner's candidature for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Medical unfitness
  • Presternal Keloid Chest
  • Disqualification for driver post
  • Reasonable classification
  • Article 14
  • Article 16
  • Doctrine of proportionality
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 49

Writ Petition No.10448 of 2019

2022-01-31

Dipankar Datta, CJ, V. G. Bisht, J.

2022:BHC-AS:1786-DB

Mr. Kranti L.C. i/b. Mr. Kaustubh R. Gidh for the Petitioner; Mr. Ashok D. Shetty a/w. Mr. P. Khosla for the Respondents

Sayyad Naim Ali Kachruddin

Border Roads Organisation, General Reserve Engineer Force, Ministry of Defence, Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging medical unfitness declaration for a driver post.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks to set aside the decision of BRO declaring him permanently medically unfit and the Medical Review Board's finding.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was declared permanently medically unfit for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport due to 'Presternal Keloid Chest' despite clearing all tests.

Previous Decisions

Medical Review Board dated 4 May 2019 confirmed the unfitness.

Issues

Whether the declaration of permanent medical unfitness due to 'Presternal Keloid Chest' is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the keloid is a minor cosmetic condition and does not affect his ability to drive. Respondents argued that the medical standard is based on operational requirements and the condition could worsen.

Ratio Decidendi

A medical condition that does not impair the ability to perform the essential functions of a job cannot be a valid ground for disqualification. The decision to declare the petitioner unfit due to a presternal keloid was arbitrary and disproportionate, lacking rational nexus to job requirements, thus violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner seeks to assail the decision of Border Roads Organisation to declare him Permanently Medical Unfit for a job as a Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) and set aside the finding of the Medical Review Board dated 4th May 2019 holding the petitioner Permanently Medical Unfit for the said post due to 'Presternal Keloid Chest'. The condition 'Presternal Keloid Chest' is a scar tissue over the chest bone and does not impair the petitioner's ability to drive.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for the post, cleared physical and written tests, was provisionally selected, but declared medically unfit on 19 February 2019. Medical Review Board confirmed on 4 May 2019. Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.10448 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 16
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Not Maintainable After Preliminary Decree. Preliminary Decree Attains Finality After Dismissal of SLP, Plai...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Medical Unfitness Declaration for Driver Post Due to Presternal Keloid Chest. Court holds that keloid is not a disqualifying condition for driving and directs BRO to reconsider petitioner's candidature.