Search Results for "pension refixation"

29 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses BSNL's Challenge to CAT Order on Pension Revision for Pre-2007 Retirees. Court upholds applicability of BSNL Pension Rules, 2007 to employees who retired before 01.10.2007, rejecting the argument that pension revision is limited to post-2007 retirees.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), and its officers challenging the order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Agricultural Officer for Excess Pension Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prolonged Delay. Recovery of Inadvertently Paid Excess Pension Without Misrepresentation or Fraud Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a former Agricultural Officer, retired on 30.04.2014 and was receiving a monthly pension of Rs.43,921 under PPO No.RO-713261. The resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Pension Based on Last Pay Drawn Without Deduction of Advance Increments Granted 27 Years Prior - Principle of Equity Prevents Withdrawal of Long-Standing Benefits in Absence of Misrepresentation or Fraud

The petitioner, a Junior Hindi Stenographer, served with the Madhya Pradesh Government from 23.04.1977 to 20.11.1985. She then joined the respondent e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Addition of Defence Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — Ex-Serviceman Entitled to Count Military Service Under Rule 3 of KPTCL Pension Regulations, 1999.

The petitioner, Sri R. Hanumatha Singh, an ex-serviceman who served in the Indian Air Force from 31.01.1972 to 08.05.1987, later joined the Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Classification of Pensioners Based on Retirement Date Held Arbitrary Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Differential treatment of pre-2000 retirees violates Article 14; MCGM directed to revise pensions equally.

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Pension Refixation Based on Post-Retirement Upgradation of Post. Pension of retired government servant cannot be revised on basis of upgraded pay scale of post after retirement.

The petitioner, Dr. J.A. Patil, retired as Director of Seeds Certification in the State of Maharashtra on 30th June 1980, holding a Class I post with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Pension Refixation by Pune Municipal Corporation. Court holds that pension cannot be reduced without affording opportunity of hearing and that fixation of pay at time of promotion cannot be reopened after retirement.

The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Chintaman Joshi, was a retired employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was appointed as an Overseer on 8th July 1...