Search Results for "penalty under MLRC"

Trending :

Search Results for "penalty under MLRC"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

13 Jul 2026

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Revenue Orders in Land Mutation Dispute Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to mutation entry and revenue orders dismissed as second round of litigation without exhausting statutory appeal under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

22 Jun 2026

The petitioner, IVRCL Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.

10 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.

12 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Enforcement of Security Interest Against Developer and Its Directors Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Trustee Is a 'Secured Creditor' Entitled to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Despite Pending RERA Proceedings.

25 Jun 2021

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, a debenture trustee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector, Pune, and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

3 May 2018

The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)