Search Results for "parole exclusion"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Convicts' Appeals on Premature Release Under Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 Due to Parole Period Exclusion. Period of Parole Counted as Remission Under Rule 335 and Excluded from Actual Imprisonment for Calculating 14-Year Requirement for Premature Release.

The dispute arose from convicts undergoing life imprisonment who applied for premature release under the Goa Prisons Rules, 2006, claiming they had co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy for Parole Overstay. Non-appointment as Night Watchman is not a punishment but a discretionary privilege, and remission cut is a valid disciplinary measure.

The petitioner, Imran Khan Sardar Khan, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition alleging double jeopardy. He was re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy in Prison Punishment and Transfer. Transfer of prisoner to Special Prison does not require prior court approval and forfeiture of remission for misconduct is not double jeopardy.

The petitioner, Niyaj Ahamad Abdul Jabbar, a convict lodged in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Double Punishment for Furlough Overstay — No Violation of Double Jeopardy as Remission Cut and Non-Reappointment as Convict Overseer Are Not Punishments Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Wilson Benjamin Castellino, a convict, was released on furlough on 19.11.2010 and was required to surrender on 4.12.2010. He failed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Remission for Prisoner Who Escaped from Open Prison. Rule 22(i) of Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962 held not violative of Article 14 as it applies uniformly to all prisoners who escape or attempt to escape.

The petitioner, Shalik Maruti Kowe, was convicted for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code on 23 June 1997 and sentenced to life imprison...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Writ Petition for Premature Release Under Remission Rules - State Directed to Reconsider Application for Release After 14 Years of Imprisonment. Life Convict's Application for Premature Release Was Arbitrarily Rejected Without Proper Consideration of Remission Policy.

The petitioner, Bhima S/o Rangnath Adagale, a life convict serving sentence in Central Prison, Aurangabad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...