Search Results for "non-existent grounds"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retraction of Statement Not Considered by Detaining Authority

The petitioner, son of the detenu Balwinder Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BARC Engineer for Sanctioning Non-Existent Works and Causing Financial Loss to Government. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was proportionate to the gravity of the charges of fraud and cheating proved in the departmental inquiry.

The petitioner, Madhukar G. Wagh, was initially appointed in May 1958 as a Senior Scientific Assistant in the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Preventive Detention Case Due to Vague and Non-Existent Grounds. Detention Order Quashed as Grounds Failed to Provide Adequate Particulars for Representation, Rendering the Detention Illegal Under Sections 3 and 4 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

The petitioner was detained under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, on allegations of black-marketing essential commodities. He challenged the deten...