Search Results for "non-examination of Investigating Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "non-examination of Investigating Officer"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Non-Examination of Investigating Officer. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on hearsay testimonies and lack of complete chain of evidence.

16 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a murder conviction where the appellant was found guilty under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for allegedl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Inconclusive Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

24 Apr 2012

The appellant, Kalu @ Sharwansingh Manoharsingh Shekhawat, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Dagdu under Section 302 IPC and for offe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Non-Examination of Investigating Officer — Adverse Inference Drawn Against Insurance Company for Withholding Material Witness. The court held that the Investigating Officer was the best person to prove the involvement of the alleged offending vehicle, and the insurance company's failure to examine him warranted an adverse inference under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Nov 2015

The appeal was filed by the claimants, Smt. Arathy and Smt. Mangalamma, against the judgment and award dated 18.11.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr....

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Acquittal in Assault Case Due to Perverse Reasoning and Non-Consideration of Injured Witness Testimony. The court held that discarding direct evidence of injured witnesses without reasons and relying on non-examination of investigating officer and non-seizure of weapons was perverse and illegal.

18 Apr 2023

The complainant, Baki Abdulgani Patel, filed a criminal revision against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate First C...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Abates Appeals and Hears Remaining Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping Under Section 365 IPC. Trial Court Had Convicted 13 Accused for Abduction and Wrongful Confinement; No Final Disposition Available in Extracted Text.

31 Jul 2014

The proceedings arose from FIR dated 13 November 1998 registered at Police Station Ashti, alleging that on 9 November 1998, the complainant Japan Raja...

High Court

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2000

7 Mar 2011

The appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Beed, which convicted the appellant for offences under Sections 393/34, 324, and 353 of the ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)