Search Results for "multiplex cinema"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Tariff Categorization of Sports Complex as Commercial. Sports complex with nominal fees held to be recreation place under LTII(b) tariff, not LTVI.

The petitioner, Malabar Hills Citizens' Forum, a public charitable trust, runs a public park and sports complex known as Priyadarshini Park on land ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Partly Allows Cinema Owner's Petition Against Entertainment Tax Demand and Penalty — Exemption Does Not Absolve Liability for Tax Collected from Customers, But Penalty Set Aside as Excessive.

The petitioner, Minakshi Chitra Mandir, a cinema hall in Sailu, District Parbhani, was granted exemption from payment of entertainment tax under the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Commercial Lease Dispute — Failure to Nominate Arbitrator Despite Arbitration Clause. Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where a party fails to appoint an arbitrator, the court may appoint one.

The petitioner, Satyam Cineplexes Limited, a company engaged in managing multiplex cinema halls, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Defendants in Copyright Infringement Suit, Quashes Ex Parte Injunction for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Record Reasons or Issue Notice Before Granting Ex Parte Injunction, Violating Mandatory Provisions of CPC.

The petitioners, Paramvah Studios Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Rakshit Shetty, were defendants in a suit filed by Lahari Recording Company (res...