Search Results for "mining industry exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners ...
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question of Quashing Non-Compoundable O...

Search Results for "mining industry exemption"

23 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Decision Quashing Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances Under EIA Notification 1994. Circular dated 14 May 2002 Allowing Retrospective Clearances Held Invalid as Prior Environmental Clearance is Mandatory Under Section 3 of Environment Protection Act 1986.

1 Apr 2020

The case involves appeals against the judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 January 2016, which quashed a circular issued by the Union...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court in Section 80-IC Tax Exemption Case — Substantial Expansion Does Not Entitle Assessee to Reset 100% Deduction Period. The court held that the fixed exemption structure under Section 80-IC(3) cannot be altered by substantial expansion, and the total deduction period remains capped at ten years.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court concerning the interpretation of Sec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Customs Duty Exemption for Gold Jewellery Imports Under Notification No. 12/2012-Customs — Interpretation of Exemption Notification Conditions. The court held that the respondent, a manufacturer and exporter of gold jewellery, was entitled to exemption from customs duty on import of gold jewellery under Notification No. 12/2012-Customs issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, as it satisfied the conditions of the notification.

12 Apr 2016

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs, and the Commissioner of Customs against an order of a sing...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Petitioner Entitled to Concessional Rate for Gold Dore Bars Imported for Refining. Proper Officer's Acceptance of Self-Declaration Precludes Reopening of Assessment Without Fresh Material Under Notification No.12/2012-Customs.

11 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s Rajesh Exports Limited, an importer, manufacturer, and exporter of gold jewellery, imported gold dore bars containing impurities f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Mining Company in Industrial Disputes Act Matter Due to Exemption of Entire Mining Industry. Notification Exempting 'Mines' Industry Under Section 1(3) of Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947, Covers Head Office as Part of Integrated Activity of Mining Company.

15 Nov 1965

The dispute centred on the applicability of the Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 to the head office of a mining co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

1 Jan 1970

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)