Search Results for "liquor shop closure"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Closing Liquor Shops on Ram Navmi — Section 142 of Bombay Prohibition Act Requires Individual Satisfaction of Collector. Blanket Circular by Commissioner of State Excise Directing All Collectors to Close Licensed Liquor Shops on a Particular Day Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association and Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association, challenged a circular dated 4th April 2006 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Restraining Shifting of Country Liquor Shop to Village Hanegaon — Gramsabha Resolution Against Liquor Outlets Upheld. Court Held That Shifting Would Be Against Village Welfare Given Existing Four Liquor Shops in Small Village.

The petitioners, residents of village Hanegaon, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to restrain the shifting of a country liquor sho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Closure Order for Country Liquor Shop Under Section 142(1) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Licence for Sale of Country Liquor is Not a Fundamental Right and Must Yield to Public Interest.

The petitioner, Satish Damodhar Kasar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensee in Excise License Cancellation Case Due to Inapplicability of Amended Rules. Liability Limited to Actual Loss with Credit for Departmental Management Fees Under Old Rule 13 of Abkari Shops Departmental Management Rules, 1972, as Contract Predated Amendment.

The dispute arose from the cancellation of a country liquor license by the State of Kerala. The respondent licensee had successfully bid for arrack sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.

The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Transfer Fees in Liquor License Shifting. Held that privilege fees not payable where shifting was compelled by Supreme Court directions and later rendered unnecessary by clarificatory order, and no actual transfer occurred.

The petitioner, holding a liquor license for a shop in Pune Municipal Corporation, was affected by the Supreme Court's order in State of Tamil Nadu v....