Search Results for "landlord consent"

624 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 624 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Competent Authority's Order for Possession Upheld Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

The petitioner, AMI Merchandising Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and order dated 14/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Against Refusal of Eviction Under Rent Control Act — Tenant's Subletting Not Proved. Landlord failed to establish that tenant had sublet the premises without consent under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the landlord, Gulabsingh Jahagirdar, against the refusal of eviction of the tenant, M/s Ambega...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Suit for Landlord's Bona Fide Need. Landlord's Title Under Will and Bona Fide Requirement for Advocate's Office Upheld Under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Manhar Auto Stores, a partnership concern, was a tenant in a shop premises owned by Dr. Hansrajbhai Shah, who executed a registered Wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...